700% Excessive Packaging!

I recently bought  a Wahl beard trimming kit at Costco. The features listed on the retail packaging were just what I wanted. The box was massive; it made it seem like I was getting a lot of value for little money. The side of the package had an energy star logo and it said “powered by an ENERGY STAR qualified battery for a better environment”.  Pretty cool – I like to be green. When I got home and opened the carton, look at what I found…

700% excess packaging and a lot of air! There was no indication that any of the inner cardboard  had any recycled content. There was no indication that soy-based inks were used in printing the large retail outer packaging. If Wahl really cared about creating a better environment, they wouldn’t create packaging that’s such an environmental disaster.

Speaking of hot air, Wahl’s web site brags about their commitment to the environment:

————————————

Our Commitment

Wahl, as an ethical global manufacturer and distributor of electrical appliances, realizes the environment is a key stakeholder, along with our customers, suppliers, shareholders, employees, communities, and countries where we do business.

  • We are genuinely committed to reducing our impact on the environment.
  • We will strive to define world-class best environmental impact practices and achieve ambitious targets.
  • We will continually reduce energy used and materials consumed throughout our end-to-end supply chain processes.
  • We will set a good example to our stakeholders by actively promoting sustainability, recycling, and using environmentally friendly materials wherever practical.

————————————

Wahl (and Costco) still have some work to do!  I intend to email both companies with a link to this post.

Walmart and Amazon both claim to be making great strides in reducing unnecessary packaging on the products they sell – I admit it does seem unfair to compare bricks and mortar retailers with on-line only businesses like Amazon on this point, but still, this packaging seems to cross a line.

Did I take it back? No, but I thought about doing that.  Next time…

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.